Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

Limits to the potential distribution of light brown apple moth in Arizona-California based on climate suitability and host plant availability

TitoloLimits to the potential distribution of light brown apple moth in Arizona-California based on climate suitability and host plant availability
Tipo di pubblicazioneArticolo su Rivista peer-reviewed
Anno di Pubblicazione2010
AutoriGutierrez, Andrew Paul, Mills N.J., and Ponti Luigi
RivistaBiological Invasions
Volume12
Paginazione3319 - 3331
Data di pubblicazione2010///
Parole chiaveEradication, Geographic distribution, GIS, Invasive species, Light brown apple moth, Modeling
Abstract

The highly polyphagous light brown apple moth (LBAM) (Epiphyas postvittana (Walk.): Tortricidae) is indigenous to Australia and was first found in California in 2006. It is currently found in 15 coastal counties in California, but nowhere has it reached outbreak status. The USDA projects the geographic range of LBAM will include much of Arizona and California and the southern half of the US, which together with economic estimates of potential crop losses have been used as the rationale for an eradication program in California. We report a temperature-driven demographic model to predict the likely distribution and relative abundance of LBAM using the detailed biology reported by Danthanarayana and colleagues, and climate data from 151 locations in California and Arizona for the period 1995-2006. The predictions of our model suggest that the near coastal regions of California are most favorable for LBAM, the northern Central Valley of California being less favorable, and the desert regions of Arizona and California being unfavorable. The model also predicts that LBAM populations can develop at two of the hottest locations in SE Australia where it is has long been known to occur. This reassessment of the potential distribution of LBAM in California and Arizona suggests that its likely ecological and economic impacts would be less than previously assessed by USDA and that its current pest status warrants re-evaluation. © 2010 The Author(s).

Note

Cited By (since 1996): 1Export Date: 27 January 2011Source: Scopus

URLhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955773098&partnerID=40&md5=2d4ef06c2ec6d03b467643a34291649d
Citation Key1035